Phoenix, AZ / April 3, 2026 – In a compelling new interview titled “Exposing the CIA’s Deep State BioTech Death Racket: Inside the Shadowy World of Covert Bio-Experiments and the Hidden Agenda Behind Pandemics,” independent researcher and CPA Kristen Williamson joins Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz to detail what she describes as a deeply entrenched network of influence centered at Arizona State University (ASU). The discussion encourages Justice Department attention to ASU leadership’s ties the CIA’s venture capital arm In-Q-Tel (often stylized as IncuTel), biodefense research, election technology investments, and broader agendas involving medical science, population control, transhumanism, and advancing biotechnology.
Williamson, leveraging her forensic accounting background and analysis of public source documents such as IRS Form 990 filings, presents evidence pointing to ASU President Michael Crow as a central figure. Crow has served as chairman of In-Q-Tel’s board since its founding in 1999. In-Q-Tel is the CIA’s “nonprofit” venture capital firm, established to invest in technologies supporting U.S. intelligence capabilities, including early contributions to innovations like touch-screen interfaces and data visualization tools. According to critics, the CIA “front” enables officials to violate FCC ‘inside-trading’ laws, and worse, advances population control technologies, dangerous bioweapons, and genocidal plagues.
According to Williamson, ASU has evolved into a “highly militarized” hub for technocratic initiatives under Crow’s leadership. Key points raised include:
The 5G Smart Region Initiative: In 2019, ASU announced plans for the nation’s first 5G Internet of Things (IoT) smart region spanning more than 20 cities in the Phoenix metro area. Williamson links this to broader “Internet of Bodies” concepts, data centers powered by Amazon Web Services, and international connectivity ambitions, including ties to the IEEE Smart World Congress.
Pacific Eclipse War Game Exercise: In December 2019, ASU co-hosted an international biosecurity simulation called Pacific Eclipse focused on a smallpox-like pandemic scenario. Williamson notes that presentations uploaded by ASU’s George Poste on January 22, 2020—days before major U.S. travel restrictions from China—depicted elements later seen in the COVID-19 response, much like the “Event 201” Coronavirus Preparedness “predictive programming.”
George Poste, a Regents Professor and Chief Scientist at ASU’s Complex Adaptive Systems Initiative, is described as a longtime figure in biodefense with industry ties to pharmaceuticals and Monsanto—the latter tied to Bill Gates and the Bayer Company. Poste holds the title Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) and has contributed to numerous government panels on biosecurity. Williamson and Horowitz discuss Poste’s decades of presentations on directed human evolution, gene drives, and lame biosecurity strategies scamming audiences through various CIA Deep State forums, including:
Discovery Oasis Biotech Corridor: ASU’s partnership with Mayo Clinic has driven the development of Discovery Oasis, a major biotechnology hub adjacent to Mayo Clinic Hospital in Phoenix. Described by Crow as one of the “most important sites on the planet for the future of health innovation,” the project involves significant investment and focuses on “precision medicine,” AI, biotechnologies, and robotic providers.
In-Q-Tel Investments and Broader Ties: The interview examines In-Q-Tel’s reported investment in companies like SCYTL (linked to election technology discussions) and Grail (involved in blood-based cancer detection promoted in medical tourism contexts). Williamson connects these to ASU’s nanotech programs—once positioned as the world’s leading Center for Nanotechnology in Society under the Obama administration—and initiatives in AI “soft governance,” water technology, and the Brain Initiative.
Horowitz, author of dozens of book sold on Amazon/Kindle, including COVID Coup: The Rise of the Fourth Reich, provides historical context, referencing declassified documents, Epstein files, and research on mRNA technologies, viral vector engineering, and alleged depopulation strategies dating back to National Security Memorandum 200. He highlights connections to figures and institutions like Harvard, MIT, Bill Gates, Boris Nikolic, Leon Black, and Jeffrey Epstein’s network including Harvard’s chemistry department chairman, Charles Lieber, convicted of sneaking nano-bioelectronic vaccine secrets to China. Dr. Horowitz frames the discussion around threats of transhumanism, Neuralink-style brain-cloud interfaces, and genetic modification via vaccines.
Williamson stresses her reliance on verifiable public records, including tax forms listing Crow’s In-Q-Tel role, open-source presentations, and local reporting. She notes ASU’s prominence in Epstein-related documents and questions the boundaries of domestic activities under Executive Order 12333, which limits CIA operations on U.S. soil, alongside informed consent requirements for human experimentation. Congress is encouraged to consider all matters central to National Security.
The conversation also touches on Arizona politics, including claims by former gubernatorial candidate Carrie Lake regarding Crow’s influence, election integrity concerns raised by researcher Gary Bernstein involving companies with reported In-Q-Tel ties, and a 2020 speech by Crow on post-COVID transformations in technology, economics, and biology.
Dr. Horowitz praised Williamson’s work as critical corroboration of long-standing research into what he calls a “criminal racketeering enterprise” involving biotechnology, intelligence agencies, and globalist agendas. “This is the most profoundly important exposé on the planet at this time,” he stated, urging dissemination to legislators, media, and the public to safeguard civilization from alleged existential threats.
Williamson emphasized divine timing in her discoveries and called for scrutiny of “authorized national security projects” versus potential overreach into healthcare and civilian life. Both expressed concerns over censorship of dissenting voices and the integration of AI, nanotechnology, and biotechnology into governance and human biology.
The full interview is available on platforms associated with Dr. Horowitz and Kristen Williamson’s Substack, where she has published detailed analyses of ASU’s role in biodefense and related initiatives.
About Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz: Dr. Horowitz is a public health scholar, filmmaker, and author with decades of experience investigating intersections of intelligence, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical industries. His works include analyses of pandemic origins, vaccine technologies, and increasingly evidenced deep-state operations. His websites include: RevolutionTelevision.net; www.DrLenHorowitz.com; WarOnWeThePeople.net; 528Radio.com; and MedicalVeritas.org, where he serves as Editor.
About Kristen Williamson: A Certified Public Accountant with expertise in audits and litigation support, Williamson has shifted focus to independent investigative research on education, technology, and Arizona power structures, emphasizing source-document verification.
This interview aims to spark informed public discourse on biosecurity, emerging technologies, and accountability in research institutions. For more information or to schedule interviews, contact the above.
For interviews, media inquiries, or additional information, contact: Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz Email: Editor@MedicalVeritas.org;
[End]
